Panthers' running back situation raises concerns for fantasy football 2026
Yahoo Sports • 1 min read • Latest: Aug 20, 2026, 11:03 AM
Last updated Aug 20, 2026

As fantasy football drafts commence, the Carolina Panthers' backfield is attracting caution among players. Chuba Hubbard remains the starter, but concerns arise as Jonathon Brooks could take over due to Hubbard's inconsistent performance and Brooks' injury history. The Panthers' rushing attack finished 19th last season, and injuries have plagued the offensive line, with Ickey Ekwonu and Taylor Moton likely missing significant time. A recent preseason game against the Buffalo Bills featured lackluster performances from Brooks and others, highlighting the uncertainty in Carolina's run game. Fantasy managers may want to consider alternative options.
- •Chuba Hubbard is currently the Panthers' starting running back.
- •Jonathon Brooks is seen as a risk due to injuries.
- •The Panthers' offensive line has significant injury challenges.
- •Carolina finished 19th in rushing yards per game last season.
- •Preseason performance against the Bills showed poor run blocking.
- 11:03 AMYahoo Sports — Panthers' backfield named fantasy football nightmare for 2026
"Here's why you may want to avoid drafting a Panthers RB in your fantasy football drafts . . .
Sources
External linksOriginal reporting and copyright belong to the linked sources. SportsNewsReport.com aggregates and links — it does not republish full articles.
Related Stories
Last 14 days
NFL•Aug 20, 2026, 12:16 PMBrowns could make franchise-altering Shedeur Sanders decision after 2026 season
NFL•Aug 20, 2026, 11:00 AMVita Vea, Bucs agree to extension to quell trade demand: Contract details
NFL•Aug 20, 2026, 11:00 AM2026 Season Opener Countdown: 24 Days Remaining
NFL•Aug 20, 2026, 10:50 AMHow to watch, listen to and livestream Raiders at Texans - Raiders.com
NFL•Aug 20, 2026, 10:45 AMReport: Bills will not be trading for Pro Bowl defender Vita Vea
NFL•Aug 20, 2026, 10:36 AMJaguars running back with notable performance in joint practice v. Panthers
