College football critics debate the impact of expanded playoff formats

As the 2026 college football season begins, observers are questioning whether an expanded playoff structure devalues the traditional regular season. Critics argue that the current focus on the College Football Playoff by major media networks like ESPN prioritizes postseason qualification over regional rivalries and historic prestige. While some view the expansion as a way to provide opportunities for programs like Indiana, others contend it serves as a postseason mulligan for traditional powers rather than a reward for sustained excellence. The shift toward a national brand-focused model mirrors professional free agency trends, leading to higher roster turnover across the sport. Despite these concerns, schools continue to focus on team building and recruiting as the primary path to national contention. The ongoing debate highlights a tension between the traditional appeal of regional college football and the financial incentives driving the national playoff system.

• 4:45 PMYahoo Sports — What Counts As a Successful Season in 2026?